1. Baranov NS, Nagtegaal ID, van Grieken NCT, et al. Synoptic reporting increases quality of upper gastrointestinal cancer pathology reports. Virchows Arch 2019;475:255-259.
2. Beattie GC, McAdam TK, Elliott S, et al. Improvement in quality of colorectal cancer pathology reporting with a standardized proforma--a comparative study. Colorectal Dis 2003;5:558-62.
3. Buchwald P, Olofsson F, Lörinc E, et al. Standard protocol for assessment of colon cancer improves the quality of pathology. Colorectal Dis 2011;13:e33-6.
4. Casati B, Bjugn R. Structured electronic template for histopathology reporting on colorectal carcinoma resections: five-year follow-up shows sustainable long-term quality improvement. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2012;136:652-6.
5. Chan NG, Duggal A, Weir MM, et al. Pathological reporting of colorectal cancer specimens: a retrospective survey in an academic Canadian pathology department. Can J Surg 2008;51:284-8.
6. Cross SS, Feeley KM, Angel CA. The effect of four interventions on the informational content of histopathology reports of resected colorectal carcinomas. J Clin Pathol 1998;51:481-2.
7. Hammond EH, Flinner RL. Clinically relevant breast cancer reporting: using process measures to improve anatomic pathology reporting. Arch Pathol Lab Med 1997;121:1171-5.
8. Ihnát P, Delongová P, Horáček J, et al. The impact of standard protocol implementation on the quality of colorectal cancer pathology reporting. World J Surg 2015;39:259-65.
9. Messenger DE, McLeod RS, Kirsch R. What impact has the introduction of a synoptic report for rectal cancer had on reporting outcomes for specialist gastrointestinal and nongastrointestinal pathologists? Arch Pathol Lab Med 2011;135:1471-5.
10. Porter GA, Urquhart RL, Rheaume D, et al. Clinical information available to oncologists in surgically treated rectal cancer: room to improve. Curr Oncol 2013;20:166-72.
11. Renshaw AA, Gould EW. Comparison of Accuracy and Speed of Information Identification by Nonpathologists in Synoptic Reports With Different Formats. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2017;141:418-422.
12. Siriwardana PN, Pathmeswaran A, Hewavisenthi J, et al. Histopathology reporting in colorectal cancer: a proforma improves quality. Colorectal Dis 2009;11:849-53.
13. Sluijter CE, van Workum F, Wiggers T, et al. Improvement of Care in Patients With Colorectal Cancer: Influence of the Introduction of Standardized Structured Reporting for Pathology. JCO Clin Cancer Inform 2019;3:1-12.
14. Srigley J, Lankshear S, Brierley J, et al. Closing the quality loop: facilitating improvement in oncology practice through timely access to clinical performance indicators. J Oncol Pract 2013;9:e255-61.
15. Zarbo RJ. Interinstitutional assessment of colorectal carcinoma surgical pathology report adequacy. A College of American Pathologists Q-Probes study of practice patterns from 532 laboratories and 15,940 reports. Arch Pathol Lab Med 1992;116:1113-9.
16. Gill AJ, Johns AL, Eckstein R, et al. Synoptic reporting improves histopathological assessment of pancreatic resection specimens. Pathology 2009;41:161-7.
17. Karim RZ, van den Berg KS, Colman MH, et al. The advantage of using a synoptic pathology report format for cutaneous melanoma. Histopathology 2008;52:130-8.